|
Business
Week -in the 1970s- probably never thought
that ONE DAY I could
find a large forum to vent this injustice (the Internet was yet to be invented)
.
So here I am! The article that I wrote is published
-in its
entirety- on this website. I also display all communication
I had with Business Week, as well as the correspondence with the
firm of Attorneys (CONDON and FORSYTH, Ave. of the Americas, NYC, NY) who took the case on its merits (contingency).
I have included scans with all the evidence: (a) parallelism of knowledge
points, (b) paraphrasing of some keywords, and (c) some other peculiar
similarities in terminology used. Please, ponder about the infinitesimal probability that
(a), (b) and (c) were result of their "independent study and
analysis" as
they claimed.
- Have you heard of applying DNA techniques
to sexual crimes committed in the 70s and 80s? All over the world,
the police has been able to apprehend quite a few unsuspecting predators who
had thought they would never be caught.
I just found out that in the Palm Beach School
District we are using a software package that determines if there has been
plagiarism of a literary piece. We did not have that in the 70s.
I am now a Math and Physics Teacher in Palm Beach county. I will be asking my
employer to review my article, and then shovel-in the Business Week's
"modified copy". I am hopeful that this "software sieve" -just
as a lie detector would do- will be able to
determine that such prestigious magazine and their pompous editors are culprits
of the lowest-of-the-low mischief of Journalism: stealing an article with no
regard for the author rights and no remorse whatsoever.
Why do not forget? Well, just think
of the benefits to our "hooked on oil" society if somebody -with the academic
credibility and the proper recognition by energy field experts- had been able to
bring a clear message -3 or 4 decades in advance- about future oil scarcity,
and about a potential atmospheric catastrophe.
These days, when most people are starting to
believe that this "pessimistic current of thought" is correct, ...
would not you agree that
misappropriating such a visionary article is not just unfair to the Writer, but
also very unfair to our society? Has the sin -from this perspective- been
big enough for you to give support to this cause, and bring the culprits to the
spotlight? If you can do something about it,
please do!
We are talking here not just of an energy
crisis lurking (planning on attacking us in the very near future), but there is
also a huge issue of a green Planet in distress, and the waters of the ocean are
rising and will be flooding thousands of square miles of lowlands. Soon
our children will be saying goodby to those beaches we all loved and enjoyed.
Both crisis are going to affect all of us to some extent, but it is going to be
life-and-death reality for many millions of people around the globe.
Is it a
crime big enough to shoot the "messenger of doom"? Somebody with better
writing skills -but less scientific brain- successfully "impersonated" this
professional, impeding Mr. Xuna from getting the recognition and merited
credibility he was entitled to in those days.
As an ostrich, we successfully buried our
head in the sand for many decades, but this path will only make matters worse
for our children. Shame on us!
Shame on you,
Business Week
Magazine!
Being Spanish my vernacular language, my English grammar at
the time (and still today) was not Shakespearian by any stretch of the
imagination. But the book's subject matter, and the article's content was
extraordinarily timely, and interesting.
Sincerely,
- John ("Juan") Xuna
- Wellington, FL 33414
- (561) 900-0270 , fax: (561)
210-1370
- Xuna@MSN.com
Clarification: Born Modesto J Álvarez
Xuna (in Vigo, SPAIN).
|